WyattRousseauNadeauEtAl2011

Référence

Wyatt, S., Rousseau, M.-H., Nadeau, S., Thiffault, N. and Guay, L. (2011) Social concerns, risk and the acceptability of forest vegetation management alternatives: Insights for managers. Forestry Chronicle, 87(2):274-289. (Scopus )

Résumé

Although public opinion and social issues have significant influence on policy-making, research on forest vegetation management (FVM) in Canada has a strong focus on biological aspects, with less attention being paid to social concerns. This paper reviews the social context in which FVM occurs. Individual views about FVM reflect a combination of values, beliefs, and attitude while also including differing perceptions of risks. Public views and the broader social acceptability of management decisions can be linked to five key factors: Context, risk, aesthetics, trust, and knowledge. Judgements about acceptability will usually change over time and across specific situations and various segments of a population could make opposing judgements. We identify a variety of public concerns related to FVM in Canada, synthesizing research that can help resource managers consider the social impacts of their choices. We also note particular concerns related to Aboriginal peoples and the FVM workforce. Information about the benefits and disadvantages of FVM options can help resolve public concerns, but using technical information to convince the public is rarelysuccessful. Forest management agencies and resource managers need access to reliable information about social values and concerns to make management decisions that will be socially acceptable.

Format EndNote

Vous pouvez importer cette référence dans EndNote.

Format BibTeX-CSV

Vous pouvez importer cette référence en format BibTeX-CSV.

Format BibTeX

Vous pouvez copier l'entrée BibTeX de cette référence ci-bas, ou l'importer directement dans un logiciel tel que JabRef .

@ARTICLE { WyattRousseauNadeauEtAl2011,
    AUTHOR = { Wyatt, S. and Rousseau, M.-H. and Nadeau, S. and Thiffault, N. and Guay, L. },
    TITLE = { Social concerns, risk and the acceptability of forest vegetation management alternatives: Insights for managers },
    JOURNAL = { Forestry Chronicle },
    YEAR = { 2011 },
    VOLUME = { 87 },
    PAGES = { 274-289 },
    NUMBER = { 2 },
    NOTE = { cited By 10 },
    ABSTRACT = { Although public opinion and social issues have significant influence on policy-making, research on forest vegetation management (FVM) in Canada has a strong focus on biological aspects, with less attention being paid to social concerns. This paper reviews the social context in which FVM occurs. Individual views about FVM reflect a combination of values, beliefs, and attitude while also including differing perceptions of risks. Public views and the broader social acceptability of management decisions can be linked to five key factors: Context, risk, aesthetics, trust, and knowledge. Judgements about acceptability will usually change over time and across specific situations and various segments of a population could make opposing judgements. We identify a variety of public concerns related to FVM in Canada, synthesizing research that can help resource managers consider the social impacts of their choices. We also note particular concerns related to Aboriginal peoples and the FVM workforce. Information about the benefits and disadvantages of FVM options can help resolve public concerns, but using technical information to convince the public is rarelysuccessful. Forest management agencies and resource managers need access to reliable information about social values and concerns to make management decisions that will be socially acceptable. },
    AUTHOR_KEYWORDS = { Forest policy; Forest values; Public participation; Risk management; Scenic values; Silviculture; Social acceptability; Vegetation management },
    CODEN = { FRCRA },
    DOCUMENT_TYPE = { Article },
    DOI = { 10.5558/tfc2011-014 },
    ISSN = { 00157546 },
    KEYWORDS = { Forest policy; Forest values; Public participation; Scenic values; Silviculture; Social acceptability; Vegetation management, Forestry; Managers; Risk management; Risk perception; Vegetation, Information management, cost-benefit analysis; esthetics; forest management; forestry modeling; forestry policy; forestry production; indigenous population; policy making; risk assessment; risk perception; silviculture; social impact, Canada; Forest Management; Forestry; Forests; Plants; Resource Management; Risk Management; Silviculture, Canada },
    SOURCE = { Scopus },
    URL = { http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79959950462&partnerID=40&md5=f3f14856a46e0cbd1dcd4866c4bb49dc },
}

********************************************************** ***************** Facebook Twitter *********************** **********************************************************

Abonnez-vous à
l'Infolettre du CEF!

********************************************************** ***************** Pub - Mycorhizes_2019 ****************** **********************************************************

********************************************************** ***************** Pub - Symphonies_Boreales ****************** **********************************************************

********************************************************** ***************** Boîte à trucs *************** **********************************************************

CEF-Référence
La référence vedette !

Jérémie Alluard (2016) Les statistiques au moments de la rédaction 

  • Ce document a pour but de guider les étudiants à intégrer de manière appropriée une analyse statistique dans leur rapport de recherche.

Voir les autres...