PapaleBlackCarvalhaisEtAl2015

Reference

Papale, D., Black, T.A., Carvalhais, N., Cescatti, A., Chen, J., Jung, M., Kiely, G., Lasslop, G., Mahecha, M.D., Margolis, H.A., Merbold, L., Montagnani, L., Moors, E., Olesen, JA¸.E., Reichstein, M., Tramontana, G., Van Gorsel, E., Wohlfahrt, G., Raduly, B. (2015) Effect of spatial sampling from European flux towers for estimating carbon and water fluxes with artificial neural networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 120(10):1941-1957. (Scopus )

Abstract

Empirical modeling approaches are frequently used to upscale local eddy covariance observations of carbon, water, and energy fluxes to regional and global scales. The predictive capacity of such models largely depends on the data used for parameterization and identification of input-output relationships, while prediction for conditions outside the training domain is generally uncertain. In this work, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used for the prediction of gross primary production (GPP) and latent heat flux (LE) on local and European scales with the aim to assess the portion of uncertainties in extrapolation due to sample selection. ANNs were found to be a useful tool for GPP and LE prediction, in particular for extrapolation in time (mean absolute error MAE for GPP between 0.53 and 1.56 gC m-2 d-1). Extrapolation in space in similar climatic and vegetation conditions also gave good results (GPP MAE 0.7-1.41 gC m-2 d-1), while extrapolation in areas with different seasonal cycles and controlling factors (e.g., the tropical regions) showed noticeably higher errors (GPP MAE 0.8-2.09 gC m-2 d-1). The distribution and the number of sites used for ANN training had a remarkable effect on prediction uncertainty in both, regional GPP and LE budgets and their interannual variability. Results obtained show that for ANN upscaling for continents with relatively small networks of sites, the error due to the sampling can be large and needs to be considered and quantified. The analysis of the spatial variability of the uncertainty helped to identify the meteorological drivers driving the uncertainty. Key Points Uncertainty due to spatial sampling is evaluated using ANNs and FLUXNET data GPP and LE budgets and IAV are analyzed with different site networks The uncertainty in upscaling due to spatial sampling is highly heterogeneous ©2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

EndNote Format

You can import this reference in EndNote.

BibTeX-CSV Format

You can import this reference in BibTeX-CSV format.

BibTeX Format

You can copy the BibTeX entry of this reference below, orimport it directly in a software like JabRef .

@ARTICLE { PapaleBlackCarvalhaisEtAl2015,
    AUTHOR = { Papale, D. and Black, T.A. and Carvalhais, N. and Cescatti, A. and Chen, J. and Jung, M. and Kiely, G. and Lasslop, G. and Mahecha, M.D. and Margolis, H.A. and Merbold, L. and Montagnani, L. and Moors, E. and Olesen, JA¸.E. and Reichstein, M. and Tramontana, G. and Van Gorsel, E. and Wohlfahrt, G. and Raduly, B. },
    TITLE = { Effect of spatial sampling from European flux towers for estimating carbon and water fluxes with artificial neural networks },
    JOURNAL = { Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences },
    YEAR = { 2015 },
    VOLUME = { 120 },
    PAGES = { 1941-1957 },
    NUMBER = { 10 },
    NOTE = { cited By 0 },
    ABSTRACT = { Empirical modeling approaches are frequently used to upscale local eddy covariance observations of carbon, water, and energy fluxes to regional and global scales. The predictive capacity of such models largely depends on the data used for parameterization and identification of input-output relationships, while prediction for conditions outside the training domain is generally uncertain. In this work, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used for the prediction of gross primary production (GPP) and latent heat flux (LE) on local and European scales with the aim to assess the portion of uncertainties in extrapolation due to sample selection. ANNs were found to be a useful tool for GPP and LE prediction, in particular for extrapolation in time (mean absolute error MAE for GPP between 0.53 and 1.56 gC m-2 d-1). Extrapolation in space in similar climatic and vegetation conditions also gave good results (GPP MAE 0.7-1.41 gC m-2 d-1), while extrapolation in areas with different seasonal cycles and controlling factors (e.g., the tropical regions) showed noticeably higher errors (GPP MAE 0.8-2.09 gC m-2 d-1). The distribution and the number of sites used for ANN training had a remarkable effect on prediction uncertainty in both, regional GPP and LE budgets and their interannual variability. Results obtained show that for ANN upscaling for continents with relatively small networks of sites, the error due to the sampling can be large and needs to be considered and quantified. The analysis of the spatial variability of the uncertainty helped to identify the meteorological drivers driving the uncertainty. Key Points Uncertainty due to spatial sampling is evaluated using ANNs and FLUXNET data GPP and LE budgets and IAV are analyzed with different site networks The uncertainty in upscaling due to spatial sampling is highly heterogeneous ©2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. },
    AUTHOR_KEYWORDS = { artificial neural networks; gross primary production; latent heat; representativeness; uncertainty; upscaling },
    DOCUMENT_TYPE = { Article },
    DOI = { 10.1002/2015JG002997 },
    SOURCE = { Scopus },
    URL = { http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84955183903&partnerID=40&md5=1efe447c1570c70e315eba24b12c95e6 },
}

********************************************************** *************************** FRQNT ************************ **********************************************************

Un regroupement stratégique du

********************************************************** ***************** Facebook Twitter *********************** **********************************************************

Abonnez-vous à
l'Infolettre du CEF!

********************************************************** ***************** Pub - ABC CBA 2020 ****************** **********************************************************

31 mai au 4 juin 2020

********************************************************** ***************** Pub - Symphonies_Boreales ****************** **********************************************************

********************************************************** ***************** Boîte à trucs *************** **********************************************************

CEF-Référence
La référence vedette !

Jérémie Alluard (2016) Les statistiques au moments de la rédaction 

  • Ce document a pour but de guider les étudiants à intégrer de manière appropriée une analyse statistique dans leur rapport de recherche.

Voir les autres...